<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guy Shechter &#187; twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guy.shechter.org/tag/twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guy.shechter.org</link>
	<description>Health care, technology, and business innovation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:38:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One way Twittering at RSNA 2009</title>
		<link>http://guy.shechter.org/2009/12/19/one-way-twittering-at-rsna-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://guy.shechter.org/2009/12/19/one-way-twittering-at-rsna-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shechter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medtech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guy.shechter.org/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overcoming the legal and regulatory hurdles associated with social technologies in MedTech is just the beginning of the battle. Companies must still segment their audience by their social-graphic tendencies in order to develop a Web 2.0 strategy that fits with their patients’ and physicians’ social technology engagement habits. I recently attended the annual meeting of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overcoming the legal and regulatory hurdles associated with social technologies in MedTech is just the beginning of the battle. Companies must still segment their audience by their social-graphic tendencies in order to develop a Web 2.0 strategy that fits with their patients’ and physicians’ social technology engagement habits. I recently attended the <a href="http://rsna2009.rsna.org/">annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America</a>, where social technology crossed paths with physicians and the medical imaging industry in a high-profile way. </p>
<p>Conference organizers generated hype around <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> and pre-announced that Twitterers should include the <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23RSNA09">#RSNA09</a> hash tag to label their RSNA related tweets. A <a href="http://rsna2009.rsna.org/twitterfeed.cfm">live feed</a> of <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23RSNA09">#RSNA09</a> tweets was posted prominently on the main RSNA conference web page. Yellow-shirted Twitter teams walked around the conference to promote the medium by drawing attention to themselves (yellow t-shirts in a sea of suits) and sponsoring <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>-mediated giveaways. </p>
<p>As a result, 163 Twitterers sent a combined 857 tweets in the nine days around the official four and a half days of the conference (see Figure 1).  The top 15 Twitterers, who generated over 55% of the total tweets, were overwhelmingly represented by commercial vendors and the RSNA staff (see Figure 2). </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-1.png"></a> </p>
<div id="attachment_177" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 535px"><a href="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-11.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-177 " title="Twitter RSNA 2009 Fig 1" src="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-11.png" alt="" width="525" height="343" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Figure 1: Analysis of tweets containing the #RSNA09 hash tag, decomposed into tweets, re?tweets, and replies.</p></div>
<div id="attachment_174" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 586px"><a href="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-22.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-174" title="Twitter RSNA 2009 Fig 2" src="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-22.png" alt="" width="576" height="432" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Figure 2: Top 15 tweeters, re?tweeters and repliers. Analysis of all tweets containing the #RSNA09 hash tag.</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-21.png"></a> </p>
<p>A lexical analysis showed that 141/857 (16%) of the <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23RSNA09">#RSNA09</a> tweets were re-tweets, indicating that one person thought it worthy to repeat what another person had said. An additional 80/857 (11%) of the <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23RSNA09">#RSNA09</a> tweets were directed at, or explicitly mentioned, another Twitterer. Using the re-tweets and referential/conversational tweets as a measure of social interaction among conference attendees and vendors, this analysis shows that there was only a moderate amount of <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>-mediated social interaction at RSNA 2009 (27% of all tweets). </p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Was <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> an effective outbound marketing channel at RSNA09? Perhaps; the silent customers, including physicians and hospital administrators, who may have been following the <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=%23RSNA09">#RSNA09</a> twitter feed, may have read vendors’ tweets and subsequently followed a hyperlink or visited their exhibit at the trade show. The entry cost for vendors to use this communication channel is negligible and their actions are immediately observable, which facilitates a rapid competitive response (see Figure 3). Yet, the modest level of social interaction suggests that the <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a> audience was not fully engaged by this social technology. </p>
<div id="attachment_176" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 453px"><a href="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-31.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-176 " title="Twitter RSNA 2009 Fig 3" src="http://guy.shechter.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Twitter-RSNA-2009-Fig-31.png" alt="" width="443" height="303" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Figure 3: Three large medical imaging vendors: cumulative tweeting by day at RSNA 2009. Philips and Siemens demonstrated a relatively consistent level of twittering, while General Electric had a surge of activity on the second day of the conference.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://guy.shechter.org/2009/12/19/one-way-twittering-at-rsna-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

